V. Hruncakova
To Win
S. Samir
To Win
Carol Young Suh Lee vs Sandra Samir Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W L W W W W W L
Form
L W W L W W W L L WH2H: Lee 0 - 0 Samir
| Lee | Stats | Samir |
|---|---|---|
| 81% (30-7) | YTD Win/Loss | 65% (15-8) |
| 0 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 739 | Ranking | 451 |
| 739 | Highest Rank | 342 |
| 23 | Age | 27 |
| - | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 16 |
| 72% (49-19) | Career Total W/L | 64% (486-275) |
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 1 | YTD Titles | 0 |
Upcoming Match
24 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Borges VS Fokina PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Bergs VS Nishioka PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
No H2H Matches Available
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Carol Young Suh Lee Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats 
Viktoria Hruncakova
Player
Carol Young Suh Lee
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
95)
3
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
2
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
41 of
54)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
95)
85
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carol Young Suh Lee
Player
Weronika Ewald
68%
(
63 of
92)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
97)
6
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
28%
(
8 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
45%
(
41 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
97)
92
Total Points Won
97
|
7-5 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carol Young Suh Lee
Player
Dasha Ivanova
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve %
66%
(
77 of
117)
6
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
5
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
46 of
77)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
52 of
117)
102
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carol Young Suh Lee
Player
Anastasia Kulikova
65%
(
44 of
68)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
63
|
6-1 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carol Young Suh Lee
Player
Arlinda Rushiti
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Carol Young Suh Lee
Player
Anastasiia Aralova
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve %
58%
(
18 of
31)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
6 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
77%
(
24 of
31)
49
Total Points Won
13
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Weronika Ewald
Player
Carol Young Suh Lee
63%
(
62 of
99)
1st Serve %
74%
(
81 of
110)
4
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
1
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
49 of
81)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
48 of
110)
111
Total Points Won
98
|
7-5 6-7(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Carol Young Suh Lee
Player
Arlinda Rushiti
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
30 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Carol Young Suh Lee
Player
Katarina Kuzmova
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Carol Young Suh Lee
Player
Alina Sogomonyan
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
5
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
16%
(
3 of
19)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
53
Total Points Won
23
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Sandra Samir Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Elena Milovanovic
52%
(
24 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Weronika Ewald
Player
Sandra Samir
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
50%
(
42 of
84)
1
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
6
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
13 of
42)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
44%
(
36 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
42 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
3-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Patricija Paukstyte
Player
Sandra Samir
69%
(
68 of
98)
1st Serve %
71%
(
67 of
95)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
9
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
44 of
67)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
42 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 6-3 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Karola Patricia Bejenaru
48%
(
19 of
40)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
41 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Daniela Piani
45%
(
25 of
55)
1st Serve %
73%
(
35 of
48)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Unknown Player
50%
(
19 of
38)
1st Serve %
40%
(
17 of
43)
5
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
32%
(
12 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
53
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vendula Valdmannova
Player
Sandra Samir
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve %
50%
(
30 of
60)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
56%
(
23 of
41)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Julie Pastikova
43%
(
17 of
40)
1st Serve %
56%
(
18 of
32)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
71%
(
12 of
17)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
30%
(
7 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
53%
(
21 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
35
Total Points Won
37
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sandra Samir
Player
Franca Cecilia Di Pietro
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
54%
(
19 of
35)
7
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
9
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
25%
(
5 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sofia Costoulas
Player
Sandra Samir
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
69)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 72% (49/19) | Win/Loss | 64% (486/275) |
| 68% (103/49) | Sets Win/Loss | 61% (1061/665) |
| 59% (814/570) | Games Win/Loss | 56% (8588/6833) |
| 75% (44/15) | Hard Win/Loss | 64% (258/144) |
| 0% (0/1) | Clay Win/Loss | 64% (220/124) |
| 63% (5/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53% (8/7) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 187 | Aces Total | 1062 |
| 0.14 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 96 | Total Double Faults | 1856 |
| 1:25:40 | Average Match Time | 1:36:3 |
| 442.49 | Average Opponent Rank | 534.54 |
| 64% (2241/3509) | 1st Serve % | 59% (24937/42097) |
| 67% (1498/2241) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (15241/24937) |
| 49% (622/1268) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (7791/17160) |
| 49% (219/450) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (3027/5894) |
| 46% (1657/3572) | Return Points Win % | 50% (20609/41415) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 44% (4/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 71% (15/6) | Challenger W/L | 49% (135/142) |
| 74% (34/12) | Futures W/L | 73% (347/127) |
| 72% (49/68) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (475/746) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 55% (6/11) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (66/140) |
| 69% (11/16) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (116/212) |
| 96% (47/45) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (482/426) |
| 4% (47/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (482/56) |
| 19% (21/4) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (278/59) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
